Election Thoughts – Christians Need to Speak with Distinctive Voice

Edc-vote-here-002

Iwill be glad when this election is over, not because I hate politics, but because I am politically passionate.  I
am a news junkie and the internet is a dangerous, time-sucking place for me.  I grew up in Iowa and I thought it was normal to meet Presidential candidates.  My
mother has shaken hands with every Democrat running for President since 1968.  She has regularly called me with
tidbits like “Joe Biden stands to close to people when he talks, he invades my personal space.”  My father, who was a
Republican, ran an air charter business, and back in the 70s and 80s he regularly flew candidates around the state.

He loved Bob Dole and Tom Harkin, because they were both ex-Navy
pilots.  Dad would let them sit in the
pilot’s seat and give them flight instruction between campaign hops.  I was a reporter for my college radio station during the 1984 elections.  My press pass
got me on to George McGovern’s jet in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, with only five
other reporters.  At the end of the press
conference he turned to me and asked if I had a question.  I have no idea what I asked, but I remember
his warmth and humanity.

By age 21, I was completely jaded and cynical, and quit my reporting job.  I decided to go to seminary because I wantedmto change the world, not report the play-by-play.

Asa pastor who believes in the Great Commandment to love my neighbor as myself, I
find engagement with world and social activism to be an essential way to love
my neighbor, and those who don’t want politics from the pulpit might as well
cut out of the Bible the Magnificat, the Sermon on the Mount and all the major
and minor prophets.  At the same time, I believe that too many pulpits have defined themselves within the narrowconfines of transitory political positions rather than transcendent divine
ideals, sounding more like the Republican or Democrat Party at prayer, rather
than independent voices proclaiming God’s justice and reconciling love for all
humanity.

 

Last October 7, ironically on World Communion Sunday, a group of more than 1000
clergy joined in to the 4th Annual Pulpit Freedom Sunday, for the
purpose of endorsing political candidates, and to challenge tax laws that
prohibit churches and other non-profits from engaging in electoral
politics.  Now folks, I don’t think being
a non-profit should constrain me from preaching as a prophet.  But I don’t see endorsing candidates as all that prophetic.  As the Christian Century
lead editorial said last week, “When the church has nothing more to say than
what could be said in a political stump speech, the church has surely lost its
distinctive voice.  It also has forgotten
that people come to church wanting and needing something quite different from
the campaign speeches and ads they they’ve been hearing all week.”  I agree wholeheartedly.   http://www.christiancentury.org/article/2012-10/stump-sermons  .

 

I was often asked to run for political office, but I always refused because I
felt like it would limit my freedom as a change agent.  Throughout our nation’s history the pulpit
has always been ahead of the ballot box.
The Beecher family, Henry Ward Beecher and Harriet Beecher Stowe (who
was the best preacher of the whole clan) were a decade ahead of Abraham Lincoln
in forming the abolitionist movement.
Walter Rauschenbusch, the Baptist Social Gospel preacher in Hell’s
Kitchen, was a generation ahead of Roosevelt’s New Deal.  Martin Luther King, Jr. preaching won the day for the Civil Rights movement, and Lyndon Johnson followed in his wake.

 

I will be glad when this election is over because we need to move on to more
serious business.  I am tired of a vision
divided between red states and blue states, weary of candidates who think only
in terms of black and white, but speak in shades of grey, while trying to
convince us they are purple, when the color I really want is green.  Political debate in the America is like the argument of an old married couple.  Each
side knows the others lines and once the argument begins it has logic of its
own until it plays out.  When tempers flared
my Aunt Ike would head for the pantry and Uncle George for door, each shouting
their last words.  George would bang the
door shut just as the first pot hit.  Aunt Ike would clear the pantry, and he would stand outside singing at
the top of lungs until she was done.
That passes for political debate in America too.

 

Monday night’s Presidential debate on international affairs was like the conversation
couples have after a big fight (like the second debate) where tough issues get
avoided and swept under the rug, trying to seem reasonable.  I kept thinking, “When will they talk about
Global Climate change?  What about the
European debt issues?  There was a little
lip service to women’s development issues, but it is pointless unless
contraception is readily available and women can control their own reproductive health.

 

Insteadwe were subjected to discussion who will keep us safe from Al Qaida?   Which candidate can make the US military the most cost-effective killing machine.  Oh,
and jobs, jobs, jobs.  I can’t wait till
those jobs assembling IPhones come home, so my children can live in a dorm room
with 5 other people, work 12 hours a day, for a subsistence wage.

 

We need to transform the conversation.  Let’s
get creative and redefine the parameters.
This conversation is fearful and stunted.  For example, there is a non-military way to
confront Al Qaida.  No one predicted the
Arab Spring.  Six month ahead of the Tunisian
uprising I read one hedge fund manager saying that global climate change and
drought conditions, was increasing commodity and food prices.  He predicted that several governments wouldfall in countries where people lived near subsistence.  Islamic nations border on the most arid
climates in the world.  Arab Spring was
the tip of the melting iceberg, because these countries are most vulnerable to climate
change.  No amount of aircraft carriers or
Predator drones are going to make the world safe when the problem is food
insecurity and crushed aspirations.  We
need to proclaim the wise stewardship of God’s creation as the primary security
to create peace and freedom from want.

 

Let’s also transform the conversation about women’s empowerment in the poorest and
most populous nations.  Subjugation of
women keeps birthrates high and wastes human potential.  Without sustainable birthrates, our planet’s
resources will be overrun.  Technology
will not save us as we reach the frontiers of sustainability.  Supporting women’s education and reproductive
health freedom solves many problems at once.
If you want to stop militant Islam in a generation, focus on women’s
empowerment.  I trust Islamic women to
stop groups like Al-Qaida in its tracks, not the US Joint Chiefs of Staff.  It will be a hard internal struggle much like
women’s suffrage and equality has been in our own country, but I say put our
policies and money behind Islamic women.

 

My first sermon hear on July 15 said that preaching needs to be a conversation
between pastor and congregation.  What we
do on Sunday morning is a holy conversation where we all listen to God.  My job is to be the discussion starter, and
then listen carefully.  This is not just
an internal conversation.  We need to change
our community and global conversations about our future, and ensure sure God’s
love and hope for the world plays a part.
The church’s worldly role must stop defending our turf and invite people
step on our grass, and maybe plant a few trees.

 

I  want to celebrate efforts you are already making in this direction.  Several people on the Peace and Justice Committee
registered 90 people to vote.  If even
half of them vote, that is remarkable.  If 300,000 churches across America did that,
there would be 27 million more registered voters.  Thanks for doing your part.

 

LastWednesday, more than 50 people came to First Church’s Ballot Question #2 panel,
and more than half the people were not from our congregation.  The panel was excellent and afterwards  people
from all opinions thanked us for providing a forum, because the issue is being
lost in the wider election din.  Dr.
Shaun Charest said afterwards this was the most enjoyable debate where he has
spoken, because he did not feel under attack and enjoyed listening to the other
side.  Let’s recover the Congregational
Meeting House tradition and make our sanctuary a safe place of respectable
discourse.  The congregational and
Baptist church traditions are one of the last spaces where there is real grass
roots democracy and problem solving.
Let’s be experts at creating real dialogue, model it in our behavior
together, and for the surrounding community.

 

We have 5 people going to Haiti this year.  We
raise support for people in Haiti and show our love and solidarity by raising
money for schools and other things needed.
But equally important, we need to hear the voices of God’s people in
Haiti.  What can they teach us about
God’s love, and about how we need to live God’s people in global
community?  How will this mission
experience change our conversation about being church?

STAY CONNECTED!
Join over 300 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.
  • GK

    I never realized how much family tales, history and talk shapes what molds or enters into the thinking of an individual. I’m glad some of them led to such positive rhetoric.
    GK